Archive
Tag "election"

$39 million in Florida? Forget Ohio. If Obama can flip Florida (which doesn’t look very friendly on the surface), McCain’s toast. Kerry states + FL = 278 EV. Kerry states – NH + FL = 274 EV. Kerry states – WI + NM + FL = 273 EV. Kerry states – PA + IA + NM + FL = 269 EV.

I could go on all day. The point is Obama and Plouffe have some serious ground game going on, and frankly, I think election day is going to be very exciting.

Now prove me right.

Read More

This was actually a pretty dramatic shift.  Details at 538.

Read More

Yglesias brings up something I remember arguing with Graham about:

Ezra Klein and Brian Beutler both observe that the Electoral College doesn’t just lead to the occasional weird or unfair outcome but also biases policy substantially. If Michigan weren’t an Electoral College swing state, there probably wouldn’t be nearly as much bipartisan enthusiasm for car industry bailouts.

Conservatives, in particular, should take a gander at Virginia’s rising swing state status with alarm since that means a state where a huge number of federal bureaucrats live is soon going to pandered to at every opportunity. National Popular Vote can save us.

I am not a huge fan of the National Popular Vote movement.  To me, just looking at electoral strategy, it provides a much higher incentive to churn up your base than an electoral college scenario.  Look at it this way:  In an electoral college system, Alabama has 9 electoral votes.  If John McCain wins Alabama by 10 points, he’ll get 9 EVs.  Likewise, if McCain wins Alabama by 30 points, he’ll get 9 EVs.  The same is not true in a popular vote system.

This places nearly zero incentive for John McCain to pander to Alabama voters under an electoral college system.  There may, however be incentive to do so under a National Popular Vote system.

The same goes for California and Barack Obama.

The bottom line is, I’d rather have the election decided by persuading moderate voters in a variety of politically heterogeneous states than have it decided by turning out the most base voters in politically homogeneous states.

Are there some bad policy decisions made because politicians are pandering to swing states?  Definitely.  Look at Iowa and ethanol.  But I think these are much less damaging than having an extremist, regional candidate cranking out huge margins in the South and winning the presidency.

Read More

A reader writes to Sullivan:

Like many Obama supporters, I’ve been in a poll-induced funk recently. So I went to the Obama HQ in downtown Orlando looking for a t-shirt, a bumper sticker, something, anything, to make myself not feel so damn worried.  Here’s what I found:

1. A brisk campaign operation staffed mostly by 25-35 year olds, all at computers, all analyzing data on GOTV operations.

2. After speaking with my precinct captain who was present, she told me that since August 1, the downtown HQ has registered 80,000 new voters.  Let that number sink in.  In the last 40 days or so, they’ve registered an average of 2,000 voters per day.

I know they probably won’t keep up that pace, but even half that is good.

3. Consider that Florida was won by Bush in 2004 by 380,000 votes. Nader got 33,000 votes. I don’t even think he’s on the ballot in Florida this year. Assume that most of those go to Obama. The margin, to beat the Bush turnout in 2004, is 350,000 (give or take 50,000 votes.)

4. To win Florida, Obama needs everything Kerry got plus 400,000 votes.

5. Of those 80,000 newly registered voters (whose info won’t be available for pollsters for weeks, if not ever, before the election), the campaign has identified over 80% as Obama supporters. That’s 64,000 new Obama votes since Aug 1.

6. Assume they decrease their registration by 50% in September, and 50% in October. After all, there are only so many people not registered to vote. That would be another 60,000 voters, with approximately 48,000 new Obama votes, who can’t be polled. All together, that’s 112,000 new Obama votes. In Central Florida alone. Since Aug 1. 25% of the 400k to get Florida’s 27 electoral votes. Since Aug 1.

7. Of course, you have to get people to the polls. However, the precinct captain said that the 80% support of the newly registered voters has a built-in no-show formula.

8. I mentioned my worry over the polls. Without condescension, without a dirty look, or a snide quip, she said, calmly as possible, “we aren’t running the Florida campaign based on polls, we’re running it based on votes. There are so many people who have signed up to vote that pollsters can’t even reach, that the only thing the campaign is looking at right now is the GOTV operation and their own internal polls which are run much more specifically than, for instance, the state Mason-Dixon polls commissioned by the Florida newspapers.”

This is always the thought in the back of my brain whispering sweet optimistic nothings in my ear, even when the going gets tough.  The bottom line is, Barack Obama has most likely assembled one of the most impressive ground games in political history, and could end up buying him somewhere between 2-4 points in the swing states.  The only thought that ever swoops in to rain on my parade is, “Does he have enough?”

Well, does he?

Read More

Via Ambinder:

Another negative messaging call in Michigan, also from Opinion Access Corp, a phone bank firm on Long Island run by Joe “Para Gringo” Rafael:

I am a student at the University of Michigan. While visiting my parents, who also live in Ann Arbor, I received a phone call from the Opinion Access Corp. Afterward while I was looking for information about the Opinion Access Corp I found your article on push polling in Ohio. The questions were basically the same as were reported in the email from Jared Littleton, but here are a few extra details:

The pollster asked to talk to the youngest male over the age of 18 in the household.

After asking the questions he asked if there were any children under the age of 18 in the household.

Also claimed that Barack voted against the protection of the privacy of sex abuse victims, voted for the release of sex offenders from jail, and voted for needle exchanges.

Heads up.

Read More

So, everyone seems to be a little worried lately about the state of the race, and I have a one word answer for y’all.  Breathe.  Something that Obama campaign has known from the very beginning is that national polls mean nothing. (Remember when Hillary was +20 in the national polls in January?)  Fortunately, we’ve all got Nate over at 538 to bring some well-needed perspective here:

McCain’s gain in our popular vote projection has been 2.1 points. Note, however, that his gains have been less than that in essentially all of the most important swing states, including Ohio, Michigan, Florida, Colorado, Pennsylvania and New Hampshire. Only Virginia is on the other side of the line, and then only barely so.

As a result of all this, the Electoral College remains too close to call, even though McCain has a 1-2 point advantage in the popular vote. Obama now has an 8.4 percent chance of winning the Electoral College while losing the popular vote, which is far and away the highest that this number has been all year. And that number may get larger rather than smaller, once polling filters in from other red states like Texas, Nebraska and South Carolina. Palin may have been a brilliant VP selection — I think even Palinophobes like me have to concede that right now McCain’s looking pretty savvy — but some of that sheen is taken off by her somewhat lackluster effect on the Electoral College.

Palin brought home the lackluster Republican base (namely evangelicals), which has boosted McCain’s national numbers, but has had very little effect on swing states.  Now make no mistake, this gives McCain some breathing room, but he still needs to veer left and capture the center in order to pull this thing out.

So, don’t be alarmed.  Ignore the national polls.  Watch the swing states.

(BTW – This whole thing is part of the reason I’m a huge fan of the electoral college, but that’s a post for another day.)

Read More